Exit poll
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| It has been suggested that Election verification exit poll be merged into this article or section. (Discuss) |
| This article is part of the Politics series |
| Elections |
| Terminology |
| Subseries |
| Lists |
| Politics portal |
An exit poll is a poll of voters taken immediately after they have exited the polling stations. Unlike an opinion poll, which asks whom the voter plans to vote for or some similar formulation, an exit poll asks whom the voter actually voted for. A similar poll conducted before actual voters have voted is called an entrance poll. Pollsters - usually private companies working for newspapers or broadcasters - conduct exit polls to gain an early indication as to how an election has turned out, as in many elections the actual result may take hours or even days to count.
Contents |
[edit] Purpose
Exit polls are also used to collect demographic data about voters and to find out why they voted as they did. Since actual votes are cast anonymously, polling is the only way of collecting this information.
Exit polls have historically and throughout the world been used as a check against and rough indicator of the degree of election fraud. Some examples of this include the Venezuelan recall referendum, 2004, and the Ukrainian presidential election, 2004.
[edit] Problems
Like all opinion polls, exit polls by nature do include a margin of error. A famous example of exit poll error occurred in the 1992 UK General Election, when two exit polls predicted a hung parliament. The actual vote revealed that Conservative Party Government under John Major held their position, though with a significantly reduced majority. Investigations into this failure identified a number of causes including differential response rates (the Shy Tory Factor), the use of inadequate demographic data and poor choice of sampling points. [1][2]
[edit] Criticism and Controversy
Widespread criticism of exit polling has occurred in cases, especially in the United States of America, where exit-poll results have appeared and/or have provided a basis for projecting winners before all real polls have closed, thereby possibly influencing election results[citation needed]. In the 1980 U.S. presidential election, NBC predicted a victory for Ronald Reagan at 8:15 pm EST, based on exit polls of 20,000 voters. It was 5:15 pm on the West Coast, and the polls were still open. There was speculation that voters stayed away after hearing the results. [3] Thereafter, television networks voluntarily adopted a course of not projecting the presidential victor until after polls closed in the West, Hawaii and Alaska excluded[citation needed]. In the 2000 U.S. Presidential election it was alleged that media organizations released exit poll results for Florida before the polls closed in the Florida panhandle[citation needed].
Some countries, such as the United Kingdom or Germany, have made it a criminal offence to release exit poll figures before the polling stations have closed, while others, such as New Zealand and Singapore, have banned them altogether.[4] In some instances, problems with exit polls have encouraged polling groups to pool data in hopes of increased accuracy. This proved successful during the 2005 UK General Election, when the BBC and ITV merged their data to show an exit poll giving Labour a majority of 66 seats, which turned out to be the exact figure. This method was also successful in the 2007 Australian Federal Election, where the collaboration of Sky News, Channel 7 and Auspoll provided an almost exact 53 percent two party-preferred victory to Labor over the ruling Coalition.
[edit] Footnotes
- ^ Market Research Society (1994), The Opinion Polls and the 1992 Election: a Report to the Market Research Society, London: Market Research Society
- ^ Payne, Clive (2001-11-28). "Election Forecasting in the UK". Retrieved on 2008-10-23.
- ^ Facts on File Yearbook 1980 p865
- ^ Comparative study of laws and regulations restricting the publication of electoral opinion polls, Article 19 (2003)
[edit] References
- Bluemthnal, Mark (2008). "Questions About Exit Polls". Pollster.com. Retrieved on 4 November 2008.
- Joan Konner, James Risser, and Ben Wattenberg (29 January 2001). "Television's Performance on Election Night 2008: A Report for CNN". CNN. Retrieved on 4 November 2008.
- Silver, Nate (4 November 2008). "Ten Reasons Why You Should Ignore Exit Polls". FiveThirtyEight.com. Retrieved on 4 November 2008.
- Sproul, Robyn (22 October 2008). "EXPLAINER: How Exit Polls Work"". ABCNews.com. Retrieved on 22 October 2008.
| Włoskie ferie Donalda Tuska |
|
Piękne szczyty Dolomitów, czyste, rześkie powietrze i wspaniałe stoki do szusowania. W takich bajkowych warunkach premier Donald Tusk spędził we Włoszech kilkudniowy urlop z rodziną, donosi "Fakt".
|
| Rekordowe inwestycje w Wiśle |
|
Wisła (woj. śląskie) ma jeden z największych budżetów w historii. Planowane wydatki sięgną prawie 43 mln zł, spodziewane dochody oscylują natomiast w granicach 36 mln. Powstały deficyt w wysokości 7 mln pokryty zostanie z kredytów.
|
| Ślisko na drogach Warmii i Mazur |
|
Błoto pośniegowe na głównych drogach nr 7 między Elblągiem a Nidzicą oraz nr 16 między Kisielicami a Ełkiem powoduje, że warunki jazdy w czwartek na Warmii i Mazurach są trudne.
|
| Wiatraki pod Łańcutem? |
|
Wzdłuż drogi krajowej nr 4 są dobre warunki do budowy elektrowni wiatrowych. Ponadto ich powstawanie w tamtym miejscu nie zagraża przelatującym ptakom. Wiedzą o tym przedsiębiorcy, którzy postanowili wykorzystać wiejące w tym regionie wiatry.
|
| Wypadek autokaru w Osieku pod Oświęcimiem |
|
10 osób zostało poszkodowanych w wypadku autokaru wiozącego górników wracających z pracy w kopalni Ziemowit, do którego doszło w nocy ze środy na czwartek w Osieku koło Oświęcimia (Małopolskie). Pięciu z nich pozostało w szpitalu - podała oświęcimska policja.
|