From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nazism

Flag of the Nazi Party (1920–1945) and of Nazi Germany (1933–1945)

Organizations Nazi Party (NSDAP) Sturmabteilung (SA) Schutzstaffel (SS) Hitler Youth (HJ) NSRL

History Early timeline Hitler's rise to power German re-armament Nazi Germany Religion in Nazi Germany Night of the Long Knives Nuremberg Rallies Kristallnacht The Holocaust Nuremberg Trials Ex-Nazis · Neo-Nazism

Ideology (non-racial) Heim ins Reich Gleichschaltung Hitler's political beliefs National Socialist Program Third Position Welfare state Religious aspects Propaganda Architecture Mein Kampf

Racial ideology Racial policy of Nazi Germany Blood and soil Nazi eugenics Doctors' Trial Nazi physicians Human experimentation Nuremberg Trials

Beyond Germany Canadian National Socialist Unity Party German American Bund Hungarian National Socialist Party Arrow Cross Party (Hungary) Nasjonal Samling (Norway) Nationaal-Socialistische Beweging (Netherlands) National Socialist Bloc (Sweden) National Movement of Switzerland (NBS) National Socialist League (UK) National Socialist Workers’ Party of Denmark Ossewabrandwag (South Africa) Ustaše (Croatia)

Lists Nazi Party leaders and officials Books by or about Adolf Hitler Nazi ideologues Speeches given by Adolf Hitler SS personnel Living Nazis Former Nazis influential after 1945

Related topics Glossary of Nazi Germany Neo-Nazism Esoteric Nazism Völkisch movement

Politics portal

v • d • e

This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2008)

This article or section contains weasel words, vague phrasing that often accompanies biased or unverifiable information. Such statements should be clarified or removed.

The Führerprinzip (help·info), German for "leader principle" prescribes a system with a hierarchy of leaders that resembles a military structure. This principle was applied to civil society at large in Nazi Germany.

[edit] Ideology

The Führerprinzip was not invented by the Nazis. Hermann Graf Keyserling, a German philosopher, was the first to use the term "Führerprinzip". One of Keyserling's central claims was that certain 'gifted individuals' were 'born to rule' on the basis of Social Darwinism.

The ideology of the Führerprinzip sees each organization as a hierarchy of leaders, where every leader (Führer, in German) has absolute responsibility in his own area, demands absolute obedience from those below him and answers only to his superiors. The supreme leader, Adolf Hitler, answered to no one. Giorgio Agamben has argued that Hitler saw himself as an incarnation of auctoritas, and as the living law itself. The Führerprinzip paralleled the functionality of military organizations, which continue to use a similar authority structure today. The justification for the civil use of the Führerprinzip was that unquestioning obedience to superiors supposedly produced order and prosperity in which those deemed 'worthy' would share.

This principle became the law of the Nazi Party and the SS and was later transferred onto the whole German totalitarian society. Appointed mayors replaced elected local governments. The Nazis suppressed associations and unions with elected leaders, putting in their place mandatory associations with appointed leaders. The authorities allowed private corporations to keep their internal organization, but with a simple renaming from hierarchy to Führerprinzip. In practice, the selection of unsuitable candidates often led to micromanagement and commonly to an inability to formulate coherent policy. Albert Speer noted that many Nazi officials dreaded making decisions in Hitler's absence. Rules tended to become oral rather than written; leaders with initiative who flouted regulations and carved out their own spheres of influence might receive praise and promotion rather than censure.

[edit] Application

During the post-war Nuremberg Trials, Nazi war criminals – and, later, Adolf Eichmann during his trial in Israel – attempted to use the Führerprinzip as a means to evade responsibility for war crimes: "I only did what I was told". Eichmann explicitly declared having abandoned his conscience in order to "do his job" and follow the orders. In Eichmann in Jerusalem, Hannah Arendt concluded that, aside from a desire for improving his career, Eichmann showed no trace of anti-Semitism or psychological damage. She called him the embodiment of the "banality of evil", as he appeared at his trial to have an ordinary and common personality, displaying neither guilt nor hatred, denying any form of responsibility. Eichmann argued he was simply "doing his job", which was supposed to be in accordance with Kant's categorical imperative. (See also Kant's What is Enlightenment?, where the argument for obedience against consciousness is made explicit.) Arendt suggested that these statements most strikingly discredit the idea that the Nazi criminals were manifestly psychopathic and different from common people. that even the most ordinary of people can commit horrendous crimes if placed in the catalyzing situation, and given the correct incentives, but Arendt disagreed with this interpretation – as Eichmann justified himself with the Führerprinzip. Arendt argued that children obey, while adults adhere to an ideology.

[edit] References

[edit] See also

• Führer
• Adolf Hitler
• World War II
• Functionalism versus intentionalism historian debate
• Obedience to Authority Study
• Charisma
• Cult of personality
• Unitary executive theory

[edit] External links

• Blind Obedience: Befehlsnotstand and Führerprinzip
• BBC historical article
• Bearers of a Common Fate?
• The Political System of the Third Reich